Quote Originally Posted by T-way View Post
I didn't really get that from the editorial. I don't think it was "anti-logging". I took it that they were just pointing out the obvious double-standard that exists: If erosion is the problem, then it shouldn't matter WHO causes it (the four wheelers OR the loggers).

I'm all for logging. But if 2 different activities cause the same environmental problem, then the same rules that are designed to protect the environment should apply to both activities!

That road, which does not have any silt fences, is sending rivers of mud into the Tellico River, which logic dictates also would be hurtful to the brook trout population.

It could easily be inferred that he's anti-logging. The tree-huggers are very good at PR and demogougery.