Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: State Supreme Court Ruling

  1. #1

    Default State Supreme Court Ruling

    Woman injured on trail loses Supreme Court case

    By ED WHITE
    Associated Press
    Advertisement

    DETROIT (AP) -- The state has no obligation to keep a northern Michigan trail in reasonable repair, the Michigan Supreme Court said Saturday as it dismissed a lawsuit by a woman who became paralyzed when her all-terrain vehicle hit a partially buried board.

    In a 4-3 decision, the court's conservative majority said the unpaved Little Manistee Trail in Lake County is not a road or highway, a designation that would require the state to maintain it.

    The court said it reached that conclusion with "little difficulty."

    The three liberal justices were on the losing side, which is common when the court hears cases testing whether someone has the right to sue.

    Beverly Duffy, 48, of Sterling Heights, sued the Michigan Department of Natural Resources after her ATV hit a board in the ground in 2007. She was thrown from her seat, struck a tree trunk and suffered major back injuries.

    "It is a broad trail, an unpaved dirt trail that has no shoulder, directly abuts dense forest, and appears wide enough to allow one lane of conventional traffic. ... Its primary purpose and use is for recreational vehicles, and this purpose eclipses the highly limited use of the trail by motor vehicles," Justice Stephen Markman wrote for the majority.

    The three dissenting justices, led by Marilyn Kelly, accused the majority of botching a simple case of statutory interpretation. They noted that the trail, about 80 miles north of Grand Rapids, has many signs that qualify it as a highway, including stop signs, weight limits and curve warnings.

    "This is a vanilla case of statutory interpretation that is easily resolved," Kelly said. State law "provides that a `highway' is a `road' that is `open for public travel.' The Little Manistee Trail satisfies this definition because it is a leveled surface designed for vehicular travel that is always accessible to the public."

    Duffy's attorney, William Boyer Jr., said the decision "doesn't shock me."

    "Back along party lines again," he said of the 4-3 ruling.

    Duffy must use a wheelchair because of her paralysis. Her husband, Dan, declined to comment on the court decision.

    Boyer said there's still a separate lawsuit pending against the Irons Area Tourist Association, a group that works with the state to tend to the Little Manistee Trail.

  2. #2
    Vertically Challenged 4x4 GLFWDA Member phittie1100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Burton, MI
    Posts
    2,443
    Blog Entries
    14

    Default

    Interesting to note that there are signs observed on that trail that have nothing to do with the ORV program - there are no curve warnings in the ORV sign inventory (snowmobile trail) - that they are using to support the case that the trail is really a road. I would be curious to see what section of the trail the accident occurred on, especially since the dissenting justices are calling it a road "...because it is a leveled surface designed for vehicular travel that is always accessible to the public."
    Paul - 2005 Wrangler Unlimited
    KD8PAV

  3. #3
    Professional Screw-up GLFWDA Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lennon, mi West of Flint
    Posts
    52

    Default

    This should be interesting to follow ...

  4. #4

    Default

    Good ruling.
    KDSRGON GL#2665 KD8EGK
    Thanks to those that do all the hard work.

  5. #5

    Default

    I,m going to look into it also. I belive it was a route not trail. The big question is weather Irons will lose thier side of the case?

  6. #6
    GLFWDA Member GLFWDA Member Trail_Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Muskegon and Oceana Counties
    Posts
    2,169
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Hi Paul! Nice to see you around!
    Pat Brower

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by signman View Post
    I,m going to look into it also. I belive it was a route not trail. The big question is weather Irons will lose thier side of the case?
    For the love of God, I hope not.

  8. #8

    Default

    Wouldn't surprise me if they won...after all...in today's world it's not your fault that this happened...it is always the other guy...so she is entitled to get money from some group.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
respective-triangle
respective-triangle
respective-triangle
respective-triangle