Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: ORV Bills HB4299 and SB0050

  1. #1

    Default ORV Bills HB4299 and SB0050

    ORV Bills HB4299 and SB0050

    There are at least two ORV bills that should interest some of you.

    Probably the most important is House Bill 4299. This bill would remove the concept of "eligible counties" and provide that all counties in Michigan can determine for them selves (along with their respective townships and municipalities) to develop ordinances--or to not do so within their respective jurisdictions. Essentially, it makes statewide what is now only the north and some of the central counties, to be able to enact ordinances. I suggest you read it and advocate for its adoption by calling your Reps in the House and, if passed there, calling and writing your State Senators. To me its good news and puts in your hands the ability to influence the process toward an end for which we did not see a path last year.

    The second bill is Senate Bill 0050 and it changes slightly the definition of ORV and introduces the definition of an ROV (Recreational off road vehicle). I think this bill, containing many other provisions should also be supported as it better encompasses all sorts of vehicles that could be considered--such as golf carts--but I think it has a firm requirement for these vehicles to be equipped with non-road tires. That is fine with me-we just need to make sure the cart people understand that point. There is lots of manufacturer stuff that needs more reflection than I have been able to do up to now.

    If you support them, get others to support them as well by actively contacting their legislative officials. Remember one call is "ho hum," three or more is maybe "my constituency may be saying something to me," and ten or more calls means "the people who voted me into office want this to happen." Look up the committees to which these bills have been referred, and if one of your reps is on the committee--tell them you support the legislation and you want the bill(s) to be brought up, passed by the Committee with a recommendation to approve and placed on the House or Senate Calendar for approval votes. Even if not, call the Committee Chair's Chief of Staff and urge getting it out of Committee with a recommendation to pass the bill.

    Steve

  2. #2

    Default

    why is there a requirement to have non road tires on ROVs. If it allows golf carts to go on the trails why the tire issue?

  3. #3

    Default

    Steve,
    forgive me if im incorrect, but I think you are crossing SB 0050 with SB 0068?

    Sponsor
    Goeffrey Hansen

    Categories Vehicles, off-road

    Vehicles; off-road; definition of ATV; revise to create separate category of recreational off-road vehicles. Amends secs. 81101, 81129 & 81130 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.81101 et seq.)

    SB 0068 is an attempt to make off road vehicle's currently classified as ORV's that are wider than 50 inches in width and up to 65 inches in width and re-classify them as ROV's. This change from ORV over to ROV is meaningless in my opinion. I'll tell you why. Any current off road vehicle that is wider than 50 inches in width can only be operated on ORV Routes or Scramble areas, and if under 60 inches in width, may also operate under PA 250 with head lights and tail lights. Changing it's definition from an ORV over to a ROV does NOTHING for where it may legally operate at. So I see no use in adding another meaningless definition to an already difficult group of ATV's & ORV's. It will only confuse user's more than they already are.A golf cart if already classified as an ORV under Michigan law if it is being used off road. In 2009,Representative Sheltrown amended the definition of an ATV, and it too, was meaningless to Michigan riders.

    This same 0068 Bill, contains new language that would also now make it illegal for out of State ORV safety certificates to be recognized while riding in the State of Michigan. This is no good and should not be supported in my opinion. In times when our ORV sport is hurting very badly for funds, if passed, 1000s of families from out of State who have younger riding youth will NOT want to come twice to Michigan. Once, for a Michigan State approved Safety class/certificate, and once again to ride. If passed, this newly amended law would hurt our local ORV communities because those families with youth who can currently ride an ATV/ORV with their out of State safety certificate's will NOT be coming to spend their $$ to buy ORV stickers, hotels/motels/fuel/repairs/ect, thus not only hurting our sport, but also Michigan's economy. And to tell you the truth, the DNR's ORV Instructor's safety academy is nothing to write home about. There are many youth from out of State who come to Michigan to ride that were trained through the Nationally recognized SVIA [ Specialty Vehicle Institute of America ] These Instructors are well trained and are certified by professional Chief Instructors. Those who instruct the Michigan DNR Instructors Academy are ''learn as we go'' instructors and do not compare to the chief instructors through SVIA. I know, I've participated in both! Not accepting an out of State ORV safety certificate from SVIA is like comparing a Chevette to a Corvette. No comparison.

  4. #4

    Default

    SB 0068is a different bill entirely and I completly OPPOSE IT.

    SB 0050 was introduced on January 16, 2013, by Senator CASPERSON

    No idea on the tire requirement......I'm guessing to keep them off the pavement (smooth ride with road tires, and thus encourage not to ride on far right) and on the shoulder.

    Steve
    Last edited by hitechman; March 29th, 2013 at 11:49 AM.

  5. #5

    Default

    Thanks Steve,
    I'll carefully look over SB OO50.

  6. #6

    Default

    Steve,
    after examining all of SB 0050, I do not understand the Rational behind changing some of the language regarding ORV and ATV's.

    (a) "ATV" means a 3-, 4-, or 6-wheeled vehicle WITH 3 OR MORE
    3. WHEELS THAT IS designed for off-road use, that has low-pressure
    4. tires, has a seat designed to be straddled by the rider, and is
    5. powered by a 50cc to 1,000cc gasoline engine or an engine of comparable size using other fuels.

    (R) (o) "ORV" or, UNLESS THE CONTEXT IMPLIES A DIFFERENT
    24. MEANING, "vehicle" means a motor-driven off-road recreation vehicle
    25. capable of cross-country travel without benefit of a road or trail,
    26. on or immediately over land, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or other
    27. natural terrain. ORV or vehicle includes, but is not limited to a multitrack or multiwheel drive vehicle.
    an ATV, a motorcycle or
    2. related 2-wheel VEHICLE, A 3-wheel, 4-wheel, or 6-wheel vehicle
    3. WITH 3 OR MORE WHEELS, an amphibious machine, a ground effect air
    4. cushion vehicle, or other means of transportation deriving motive
    5. power from a source other than muscle or wind, MAY BE AN ORV. AN
    6. ATV IS AN ORV.

    ANY off road vehicle in the State of Michigan that does not fit all the criteria's of an ATV as defined in its MCL, is AUTOMATICALLY defined as an ORV under Michigan law. And further , even though an ATV is a ''SUB GROUP'' of an ORV, it is not legally a ORV if it fits all the definitions of an ATV under the MCL of ATVs.

    Can somebody please explain the Rational behind this change?
    Last edited by Rocky; March 27th, 2013 at 06:14 PM.

  7. #7

    Default

    and then we wonder why gov. Has things so messed up??.

  8. #8

    Default

    Can somebody please explain the Rational behind this change?

    I guess not!

  9. #9

    Default

    Golf carts and others are not currently defined as OHV/ORV's. This would add them to that definition. They probably want road tires off golf carts so better traction off road, and to keep them off the paved road surface.

    I know when we worked on the ORV Ordinances in Gratiot County and the City of St. Louis, we specificaly had to add to include golf carts as they were not included under the current law. Lots of counties with ORV laws EXCLUDE golf carts because they are not mentioned as an ORV allowed on county roads.

    Steve

  10. #10

    Default

    [QUOTE=hitechman;68213]Golf carts and others are not currently defined as OHV/ORV's. This would add them to that definition. They probably want road tires off golf carts so better traction off road, and to keep them off the paved road surface.

    I know when we worked on the ORV Ordinances in Gratiot County and the City of St. Louis, we specificaly had to add to include golf carts as they were not included under the current law. Lots of counties with ORV laws EXCLUDE golf carts because they are not mentioned as an ORV allowed on county roads.
    STEVE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lets take a look at the Definition of an ORV under current MCL,

    (o) "ORV" or "vehicle" means a motor-driven off-road recreation vehicle capable of cross-country travel without benefit of a road or trail, on or immediately over land, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or other natural terrain. ORV or vehicle includes, but is not limited to, a multitrack or multiwheel drive vehicle, an ATV, a motorcycle or related 2-wheel, 3-wheel, 4-wheel, or 6-wheel vehicle, an amphibious machine, a ground effect air cushion vehicle, or other means of transportation deriving motive power from a source other than muscle or wind. ORV or vehicle does not include a registered snowmobile, a farm vehicle being used for farming, a vehicle used for military, fire, emergency, or law enforcement purposes, a vehicle owned and operated by a utility company or an oil or gas company when performing maintenance on its facilities or on property over which it has an easement, a construction or logging vehicle used in performance of its common function, or a registered aircraft.

    SB 0050 proposed CHANGES

    (R) (o) "ORV" or, UNLESS THE CONTEXT IMPLIES A DIFFERENT
    MEANING, "vehicle" means a motor-driven off-road recreation vehicle
    capable of cross-country travel without benefit of a road or trail,
    on or immediately over land, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or other
    natural terrain. ORV or vehicle includes, but is not limited to, a
    A multitrack or multiwheel drive vehicle, an ATV, a motorcycle or
    related 2-wheel VEHICLE, A 3-wheel, 4-wheel, or 6-wheel vehicle
    WITH 3 OR MORE WHEELS, an amphibious machine, a ground effect air
    cushion vehicle, or other means of transportation deriving motive
    power from a source other than muscle or wind, MAY BE AN ORV. AN
    ATV IS AN ORV. ORV or vehicle does not include a registered
    snowmobile, a farm vehicle being used for farming, a vehicle used
    for military, fire, emergency, or law enforcement purposes, a
    vehicle owned and operated by a utility company or an oil or gas
    company when performing maintenance on its facilities or on
    property over which it has an easement, a construction or logging
    vehicle used in performance of its common function, or a registered
    aircraft.


    What part of the above definition of an ORV does not define a GOLF CART as an ORV when used off road?

    Under PA 451, section 811, there is no such vehicle as a OHV in Michigan. We either have ATV's in Michigan or we have ORV's.
    Last edited by Rocky; March 31st, 2013 at 09:40 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
respective-triangle
respective-triangle
respective-triangle
respective-triangle